I would be more inclined to go with V. panoptes for this one. I know the Panoplies out here are quite heavy set, even when they are younger they are quite bulky. Also the leopard prints are just more pronounced then that of a V. gouldii; but different locals vary with their patterning. V. gouldii also have thick patterning down their legs too where Panoplies lack. (But again I guess that could vary on local. Panoplies out here that I've seen have little leg marking.)
I've never heard them be called a Argus before, learn something new every day!
You are right. I had a herpetologist friend of mine confirm that this was a panoptes -- I'm just lazy and didn't change the title over here. But thanks so much for the extra information! Always good to learn!
You're most welcome. I'm still learning myself and there is ALWAYS so much more to learn! I love Panoplies but I've always struggled taking any decent photos of them, (I do have a few right on dusk of one that was up a tree)they never seem to want to sit and pose.
It's alright being lazy, I know I am. (Also, a very late thanks for the watch)
You could be right? It seemed a little too heavyset to be panoptes, and we're a little further south than you would expect to find them, but telling the difference between sand goannas and Argus monitors is a pain.
V. gouldii also have thick patterning down their legs too where Panoplies lack. (But again I guess that could vary on local. Panoplies out here that I've seen have little leg marking.)
I've never heard them be called a Argus before, learn something new every day!
It's alright being lazy, I know I am.
(Also, a very late thanks for the watch)